A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 13:30 on February 6, 2016, the Defendant stolen the property equivalent to 118,000 won in total at the market price, such as beef 764g, raw ginseng 1 omitted, red city 1 omitted, 1 package, 1 package of putl and putl and 1 package of putl and putl and 3 times, and 118,000 won in total.

around 16:00 on April 2, 2016, the Defendant stolen the property equivalent to KRW 24,160 on the aggregate of KRW 1,300,00,000, 3,300, 6,980, 133,000, 2,280, 1,280, and 1,5,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00,00,000, for the victim G in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, Busan-do.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 1135"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Photographs of damaged articles 2016 Mano 1554;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the police statement protocol to G;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is also recognized that the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see the reason for sentencing) of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommending punishment] The circumstance is also acknowledged such that the defendant is highly likely to repeat the crime in light of the fact that the defendant was already subject to 13 times or criminal punishment in the mitigated area (4 to 10 months) of the mitigated area (4 to 10 months) of the theft against general property [the person subject to special mitigation] [the decision of sentence] of the crime subject to a suspended sentence of the same kind of crime, including one time for the suspended sentence of the sentence of the same crime, but the defendant has already been subject to 13 times or more of the suspended sentence. However, it is highly likely that the crime subject to the livelihood penalty, the degree of damage, the degree

In light of the aforementioned circumstances, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.