logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.08.23 2016고정3051
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A dietitian working at a group meal service facility that fails to perform the duties of dietitian E shall perform duties of preparation of meals in a group meal service facility, inspection of meals and distribution management, examination and management of purchased foods, sanitary management of meal service facilities, preparation of logs for the operation of a group meal service facility, nutrition guidance for employees and education on food sanitation;

Nevertheless, around May 2015, the Defendant was employed as a dietitian in the same Gu H, “G kindergarten” located in the same Gu H, “K kindergarten located in the same Gu,” and “M kindergarten” located in the same Gu L, and served as a dietitian by each kindergarten until October 2016 after receiving KRW 50,000 won or KRW 100,000 per month from each kindergarten, and issued a dietitian’s license and prepare and send a monthly food table to e-mail, and send it by visiting only one to two times per month to check food-related books, etc., and did not perform the duties as above dietitians, such as inspection and distribution management, and inspection and management of purchased food.

2. Defendant D is the operator of a group meal facility in a kindergarten as the head of the “G kindergarten” in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.

The Defendant, a dietitian E, who is an employee of the Defendant, committed a violation of the duty of a dietitian, as in paragraph (1) in connection with the Defendant’s business.

3. Defendant A is the operator of a group meal facility in a kindergarten as the head of the “I kindergarten” in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H.

The Defendant, a dietitian E, who is an employee of the Defendant, committed a violation of the duty of a dietitian, as in paragraph (1) in connection with the Defendant’s business.

4. Defendant B is the operator of a group meal facility in a kindergarten as the head of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K kindergarten.

The Defendant, a dietitian E, who is an employee of the Defendant, committed a violation of the duty of a dietitian, as in paragraph (1) in connection with the Defendant’s business.

5. Defendant C is Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L.

arrow