1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 1, 2014, the Plaintiff, a person working as the Ministry of Government Legislation B from January 1, 2014, was diagnosed and applied for approval of medical care for the instant injury and disease on March 4, 2014.

B. On March 31, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to approve the Plaintiff’s application (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the instant injury and disease was caused by external factors, such as physical and mental factors, regardless of official duties, and thus, causation with official duties is not recognized (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that he was unable to use his leave in various public offices, including the Ministry of Government Legislation, Cheongdae, Gyeonggi-do, etc., and prepared a new report on the progress of his work, etc. even after having returned to the Ministry of Government Legislation, and carried out excessive tasks and excessive burden.

Therefore, although the plaintiff's injury and disease of this case was caused by excessive work of the plaintiff and his severe burden and stress, the defendant's disposition of this case which did not recognize the causation between the plaintiff's duty performance of the above branch of this case is unlawful.

B. From around 1995, the Plaintiff began to serve as Grade V official in the Ministry of Government Legislation’s legislative information planning department, the adjudication division of the administrative appeals management bureau, etc., and during the period from March 20, 2008 to January 1, 2012, the Plaintiff worked as an advisory office of Gyeonggi-do for the period from January 2, 2012 to December 31, 2013, while working as an advisory office of Gyeonggi-do for the period from January 1, 2014 to December 21, 2013, and the Plaintiff was on duty as an advisory office of the Ministry of Government Legislation from January 1, 2014 to the Ministry of Government Legislation B. 2) while working as an advisory office of Gyeonggi-do, the Plaintiff was on duty at 7:00 p.m. at 7:0 p.m., and was on duty at 8:0 p.