1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. At the time of the occurrence of the basic fact-finding accident, the Defendant’s vehicle, at around 08:35 on June 27, 2019, when the insured vehicle, the insured vehicle CD of the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle, and at around 08:35 on June 27, 2019, went into the direction of the building E in the situation of the collision between the vehicle fixed in one lane and the two lanes in the shape of the vehicle at the time of the instant three-lane road. The Plaintiff’s vehicle proceeding along three-lanes in the shape of the vehicle at the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and entered the instant three-lanes from the front part of the road adjacent to the Defendant’s front part of the vehicle at the time of the accident. At the time of the accident, the amount of the insurance proceeds paid to the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the time of the accident at issue, the circumstances surrounding the vehicle’s final payment of the insurance proceeds at KRW 75,2500,000,9.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 to 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was under direct control pursuant to normal signals, and thus, there was no means to avoid or avoid the accident, by predicting that the Defendant’s vehicle would attempt to turn to the left.

As such, the accident of this case is caused by the negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle.

B. Since the location of the instant accident by the Defendant is a three-distance where the vision of the unprotective coordinates is permitted, the Defendant’s driver of the Plaintiff is obliged to safely conduct the instant accident in preparation for the occurrence of a vehicle having access to the unprotective coordinates.

Therefore, the defendant vehicle first enters the intersection and makes a left-hand turn, and the plaintiff vehicle that has a disability in the view of the view due to the solid vehicle has neglected the front-down, and the case is bound by this case.