The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not appear in the patrol vehicle while demanding the presence of the office, and the Defendant was killed in the patrol vehicle on the ground that the police officer asked the head of the office or the taxi stop and asked the head of the office or the taxi stop to wear the Defendant.

2. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, in particular, witness E and F’s statements at each court of original trial, the defendant demanded the police officer who was patrol to get on the back of the patrol while demanding him to leave the patrol as stated in the judgment of the court below, and was led to the above police officer, despite being towed by the police officer, the above police officer could sufficiently be recognized that the police officer who was performing his duties committed an assault, such as going against the police officer’s body, going against the disturbance, going against the disturbance, going back of the patrol police officer who attempted to leave the patrol, and going back again to take on his own discretion, so the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.