logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고단7430
업무방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 28, 2016, 01:20, the Defendant: (a) within the “C essential point” located in Sinpo City B on August 28, 2016, on the ground that, while drinking alcohol with a entertainment receptionr, the Defendant refuses to meet his body by a entertainment receptionr participating in the entertainment with the entertainment receptionr; (b) the Defendant, as a head of Sinpo City, Do, refuses to visit the body of the receptionr; and (c) the Defendant, as the victim D, who was working at the said place, would have the victim D’s visit and enter the said visit “whether Irop education is conducted.”

“Along with sound, it interfered with the management of a victim’s entertainment store by force by avoiding the disturbance, such as leaving the fire, the left, and the left from the room to the outside of the room, and leaving it on the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the scene of damage;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including observation of protection and orders to provide community service and attend lectures;

1. The basic area (from June to June) of the sentencing criteria (no person subject to special sentencing) (no person subject to special sentencing) shall interfere with the business of applying the sentencing criteria (the scope of the recommended punishment).

2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) no agreement has been reached with the victim of the decision of sentencing; (b) the Defendant did not have any record of being punished for the same kind of crime; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct; (d) the process and motive leading to the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances before and after the instant crime; and (e) the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, the sentencing guidelines shall be set off within the scope of the sentencing guidelines, and the sentence like the order shall be imposed.

arrow