logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.06.26 2013가단32531
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant amounting to KRW 9.5 million to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s 6% per annum from June 6, 2013 to June 26, 2014.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

On October 25, 2010, the Defendant awarded a contract for the construction of a new factory on the land outside Kimhae-si and four parcels and for the construction of refined oil in recycling facilities at the place. On October 25, 2010, the Defendant awarded a contract for all the construction of refined and distilling facilities, including the construction of the above factory building, in KRW 900 million.

Since then, AS Co., Ltd has suspended the construction in a state of progress only through certain process.

Accordingly, on March 18, 2012, the Defendant awarded a contract for construction works for the construction of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the completed factory in question to the KNB industry in the amount of KRW 295 million (excluding value-added tax). However, a dispute arising between the Defendant and the KNB industry in relation to the said construction works, and the KNB industry suspended construction works only with some construction works

(At present, the Defendant was awarded a contract to the Plaintiff, who runs the steel structure business under the name of D, which had been engaged in the construction before and after the date of completion of the remaining construction (hereinafter “instant construction”) with the cost of KRW 27 million (excluding value-added tax), among the above land’s pipeline construction and steel structure construction, on June 14, 2012. As for the construction details in the contract, the construction work was stated in the contract form as “On-site pring, organic solvent-forming, luxing, luxing, luxing, luxing, luxing, luxing, luxing, luxing, luxing, luxing, luxing, luxing, luxing, luxing, luxing, luxing, manufacturing and re-manufacturing, and re-manufacturing, separately from the existing construction and re-construction pipes.”

Since then, the Plaintiff completed the instant construction work.

The defendant has paid to the plaintiff the sum of KRW 20,200,000 as the construction price of this case until now.

【Ground of recognition” without any dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, and the defendant 2 shall sign the evidence No. 1-2.

arrow