The judgment below

The guilty portion shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The judgment below

Part of acquittal.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Regarding the charge of attempted fraud against the victim C, the prosecutor 1) misunderstanding of facts (the acquittal part of the judgment of the court below) (1) stated that C, despite the fact that it was a green signal, etc. at the time of the instant case, was changed at a rapid speed by entering C’s vehicle and stopped immediately after entering C’s vehicle, which led to which C had no choice but to receive the vehicle of the defendant. The credibility of C’s statement can be recognized, and the defendant intentionally caused the instant traffic accident with the intent to receive an agreement from the victim by admitting repair money. ② With regard to the fraud against the victim D, D stated that D had changed the vehicle after checking the distance between D and D’s vehicle at a five-lane distance from the Defendant’s vehicle at the time of the instant case. Thus, from the perspective of the defendant, the court below erred in the misapprehension of the judgment of the judgment of the court below as to attempted fraud (the remaining part of the judgment of the court below) and the fact that it caused the fraud of the victim.

B. Defendant 1) misunderstanding of facts (in the judgment of the court below, each of the criminal facts of "2012 Highest 1542" and each of the criminal facts of "2013 Highest 79" in paragraph (1) of "2013 Highest 79" as stated in the judgment of the court below, there was a collision of vehicles due to F's negligence in relation to each of the criminal facts of "2012 Highest 1542" and "2013 Highest 79" as stated in the judgment of the court below, and F runs away from giving a mutual agreement.