beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion
A. On March 21, 1912, the Plaintiff: (a) on March 21, 1912, 1, 1,021, 1,021, 2, 2, 54, 3, 1,084, 4, 300, 500, 1,052, 1,052, respectively.
B. Each of the above lands shall be subject to a change of land category, division, etc., (1) land shall be the real estate listed in the annexed sheet 1, (2) land shall be the real estate listed in the annexed sheet 2 and 3, and (3) land shall be the real estate listed in the annexed sheet 4, and (4) land shall be the real estate listed in the annexed sheet 5, and (5) land shall be the real estate listed in the annexed sheet 6 and 7.
C. Each registration of ownership preservation stated in the purport of the claim was completed in the name of the Defendant’s Republic of Korea with respect to each real estate stated in the separate sheet No. 1 to 4.
Attached Form
With respect to each real estate listed in the list Nos. 5, 6, and 7, the registration of ownership transfer stated in Q and R’s joint names were completed. Of the real estate listed in the list No. 5 attached hereto, the registration of ownership transfer stated in the claim in the name of Defendant G was completed.
K died on May 12, 1925, but on January 17, 1908, KS, the South-Named S, the president of K, had already died on January 17, 1908, and T, the president of S solely succeeded to K.
T was killed on May 20, 1965, but U, his spouse, no lineal ascendant or descendant, succeeded to T. U. on November 12, 1967, and V succeeded to T.V. upon the death of V on November 29, 197.
E. Defendants B, C, D, and E are co-inheritors of net Q, and Defendants F, G, H, J, and I are the deceased R co-inheritors.
F. Therefore, the Defendants, the heir of the circumstance titleholder, are obligated to perform the procedure for registration cancellation of each registration stated in the purport of the claim.
2. Determination as to the defendants' main defense
A. The instant lawsuit on the defense of this case conflicts with the res judicata of the previous final and conclusive judgment.
B. The plaintiff asserts that he/she is the heir of K, who is the name of the circumstances of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 7.