1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. Upon the plaintiff's preliminary claim added at the trial, the defendant shall be the plaintiff.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "the plaintiff is deleted from "the plaintiff," "the 3th of the first instance judgment," "the 10th trial's 6th trial's 10th trial's 10th trial's 10th trial's 6th trial's 6th trial's 6th trial's 2th trial's 2th and 3th trial's 4th trial's 3th trial's 4th trial's 4th trial's 6th trial's 6th trial's 6th trial's 6th trial's 18th trial's 18th trial's "the plaintiff's 3th trial's 4th trial's 10th trial's 10th trial's 4th trial's 10th trial's 10th trial's 2th trial's 10th trial's 2th trial's 3th trial's appeal'.

“The Defendant’s assertion on the grounds of the previous claim in the claim for damages arising from the deception of the instant termination agreement, such as the Plaintiff’s above assertion, and the deception of the agreement money of KRW 300 million, as seen in paragraph (2) of the above judgment of the court below. In addition, as seen in paragraph (2) of the above judgment, the Defendant’s assertion on the deception of the sales contract set forth in Paragraph (a) (1) of the above 1-A, which is the subject of the instant termination agreement, and on the grounds of the conjunctive claim added at the party’s trial in the claim for damages arising from the tort of deception of KRW 300 million in the name of the purchase price, and the subsequent ancillary claim in the claim for damages arising from the fraudulent fraud of KRW 300 million in the name of the purchase price. As such, the Seoul Western District Court was sentenced to a three-year imprisonment with labor on October 19, 2016 at the Seoul Western District Court [Seoul Western District Court Decision 2015Da25630180, supra.