A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 27, 2015, upon receipt of a civil winning judgment of the defendant, the defendant attached the bond-backed movables (type 7) together with the execution officer D of the Goyang branch court's Goyang branch court's high-level branch court's high-level branch court at a factory operated by the defendant located in Pakistan as of April 27, 2015.

However, around May 10, 2015, the Defendant removed the attachment list attached to seven kinds of seized objects from the above factory, and sold the seized objects to the name-dissatise for KRW 14 million.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Decision on recommendations for execution;

1. Application of statutes to a report on attachment of corporeal movables and a report on inspection of seized objects;

1. Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that a compulsory execution officer actually becomes a paperless due to the defendant's crime, and that the actual victim suffered double pain is disadvantageous.

However, the execution shall be postponed only once in consideration of the amount claimed by the actual victim and the amount of profit earned by the defendant, the circumstances in which the defendant is reflecting, past past power relations, the gender, age, family relationship, economic circumstances, etc. of the defendant.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.