1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Attached 1 List:

1. (1) warehouses and chickenss, warehouses referred to in (2) of the real estate stated therein;

1. Basic facts

A. The Intervenor, who is the father of the Defendant, was the owner of the land C and D (hereinafter “each land of this case”), and the Defendant, together with his wife E, engaged in the historical and livestock industry on each land of this case and its adjacent land.

B. The Plaintiff, as an executor of an industrial complex development project (hereinafter “the instant project”), tried to consult with the Defendant on the transfer of obstacles to each of the instant land and adjoining land included in the project district of the instant project, but did not reach an agreement. On December 21, 201, the Central Land Expropriation Committee applied for adjudication on expropriation to the Central Land Expropriation Committee. On April 6, 2012, the Central Land Expropriation Committee rendered a adjudication on expropriation on the transfer of the instant obstacles to the instant project, and the compensation for losses shall be KRW 147,704,470, and the date of commencement of expropriation shall be May 30, 2012 (hereinafter “instant adjudication on expropriation”).

C. On May 22, 2012, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 143,511,060 (hereinafter “instant deposit”) with the Defendant as the Defendant KRW 147,704,470, the Defendant’s compensation amounting to KRW 4,193,410 (i.e., charge for compelling compliance + KRW 3,854,000 + KRW 339,410,00), which was deducted from the Defendant’s compensation amounting to KRW 143,51,060 (hereinafter “instant deposit”).

The Defendant filed an objection with the Central Land Expropriation Committee by asserting that the compensation for losses were raised in accordance with the reality due to the instant adjudication on expropriation, but the said objection was dismissed on August 10, 2012.

E. The plaintiff expropriates each land of this case and its neighboring land and its obstacles.