1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid additionally shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the underlying facts is as follows: (a) except for the fact that “ April 21, 2015” of the first instance court No. 3, No. 3, 2015 is deemed as “ April 21, 2014,” the corresponding part of the reasoning for the judgment of the first instance is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The reasoning for the court's explanation on this part is that the part on the structural calculation service contract part of No. 4, No. 14, et al. of the first instance court's judgment is identical to the corresponding part on the grounds of the first instance judgment except for the alteration as follows. [2] The part on structural calculation service contract part of the first instance court's judgment, Gap evidence No. 1, No. 24, and Eul evidence No. 1 (including the number of main points), comprehensively taking into account the whole arguments, ① the part on structural calculation service contract of the second instance court's judgment on Sep. 13, 2014 and the part on structural calculation service contract of the second instance court's decision on Feb. 13, 2014 and the part on structural calculation related to the second instance's construction work of the second instance court's decision on Sep. 1, 2013 and the part on structural calculation related to the second instance's construction service contract of the second instance court's decision on Feb. 13, 2014.