The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendant is an insulting article of SK K Br World, C’s Internet opening articles.

On September 12, 2015, around 09:07, the Defendant: (a) transferred customer information on a mobile phone for business to A4 paper in the office of the Co., Ltd. located in Da at 2015, the head of the Technology Team, at his own workplace, the victim E in the interest of the team leader of this Technology Team, “I k k k k k k k k k k k k, but he refused to do so,

In this regard, there is a place where the case F, G, H, I, etc., an employee of the same office, is located, such as the case F, G, H, and I, “h. C. C. C. C., a fake “publicly insulting the victim”.

B. The Defendant interfering with the business is a company’s Internet opening engineer, and the Defendant is present at the D2-story C office at around 09:30 on March 26, 2015, at around 09:30 on March 26, 2015, and on the ground that the victimized Party C does not reduce its working area and does not properly reduce its working area, see “I see” to E, the general team leader

Corresses,

After having expressed the desire to "Sicker", the victim interfered with the victim's business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 10 minutes, such as putting the office wave into a string, and putting the manager and the head of G with the desire to “the year in which she is a pastor.”

2. Determination

A. As to the insult, E’s statements at this Court and the police are consistent with the above facts charged.

However, according to the records of this case (in particular, the result of the appraisal commission to the National Scientific Investigative Research Institute), it is not confirmed that the defendant expressed a desire to E even if he increased the recorded contents at the time of the above case.

Even if the defendant made a statement identical to the above facts charged,

Even if the defendant who had been engaged in trade union activities and the victim E have continuously conflicted, and even on the day of the case, customer information was transferred to A4 paper, and such statement was made in the situation of vision, and even if based on the result of the above appraisal entrustment, the defendant is such.