The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for three years) of the lower court is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In the case of the defendant, the defendant and the respondent for an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") displayed a knife knife for the victim to kill the victim, and the victim suffered bodily injury, especially in light of the part of the bodily injury, the crime of this case may have serious risks to the life and body of the victim. The crime of this case was attributable to the defendant's drinking habit, and the defendant was assessed as "aUD-K" in the test of screening the alcohol use disorder of the defendant. The defendant was assessed as "aUD-K", and the defendant was punished several times for crimes related to violence, which are disadvantageous to the defendant.

The circumstances are favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant was taking measures to rescue the victim by reporting the 119 report, etc. immediately after the crime, that the mother of the defendant was responsible for medical expenses, etc. of the victim, that the victim filed a repeated appeal against the defendant, that there was no big bodily injury to the victim in terms of the result, and that the defendant who committed the crime of this case by drinking and contingently flying his mistake.

In addition to the above circumstances, comprehensively taking account of the following conditions, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court sentencing committee, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

B. In the case of a request for attachment order, the prosecutor submitted a petition of appeal stating “the scope of appeal” as “the entire amount,” but did not submit any grounds for appeal regarding the request for attachment order.

. This part.