All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The entire period of the instant crime is not so long as the entire period of the instant crime is determined, and the Defendant suffers from serious fluorial color, and the Defendant has no record of punishment for unlawful circulation of game water like the instant case is a sentencing factor favorable to the Defendant.

However, on December 1, 2013, the Defendant committed the instant crime and sentenced the Defendant to the punishment by committing the instant crime, even though the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. was completed by the Gwangju prison on December 1, 2013.

Considering the above facts, and other factors of sentencing as indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, etc., the punishment determined by the lower court against the Defendant is deemed unfair because it is too hot or hot within the reasonable scope of sentencing.

Therefore, the defendant and prosecutor's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since each appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.