logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.09.26 2012고정2992
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On June 26, 2012, around 09:20 on June 26, 2012, the victim C reported to the defendant who was employed in the toilet located in the Madge Flux Center of the sixth floor of the building D, on the ground that the defendant was able to take a bath for a tension in the women's slope room before the preceding day, and that he was able to do so, the defendant would be able to do so, and the above fighting would be followed by the defendant's fighting, and the defendant's shoulder was tightly sealed in a madice, flabing the head, flabing the head of the defendant's shoulder in good hand, and walked about 2:3 times by walking the part of the clothes with the hand-to-face, and caused an injury, such as a scambling, which requires multiple treatment for the previous two weeks.

On the other hand, the defendant was injured by the 10-day care for the 10-day care of the 10-day care of the 10-day care for the 10-day care of the 10-day care for the 10-day care of the 10-day care for the 10-day care of the 10-day care for the 20-day care for the 20

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Part C of the interrogation protocol of the accused and C by the prosecution

1. A medical certificate of injury (investigative records No. 49 pages), and a medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each suspect C Bodily Injury photographed Act;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order. Although the Defendant had been aware of the victim’s head debt at the time of the instant case, this constitutes self-defense or legitimate act as a defensive act against the victim’s act of violence. However, as seen earlier, the Defendant purchased the victim’s head debt at the time of the instant case, and subsequently, purchased the victim’s head debt at the time of the instant case at several times, and discovered the part of the victim’s head.

arrow