1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. (i) The Plaintiff is the president at E University (hereinafter “instant University”).

B. Defendant B was appointed as a full-time teacher of the pertinent university on September 1, 1996, and was removed from office from office on May 18, 2016 from the disciplinary committee of the school foundation F of the instant university (hereinafter “instant school foundation”).

Defendant C was appointed as a teacher of the University on August 1990, and was decided on August 25, 2016 by the board of directors of the Educational Foundation of this case.

Applicant Defendant D was appointed as the golf industry and assistant professor of the instant university on March 1, 2013, and was dismissed on December 29, 2016 by the Disciplinary Committee of the instant school foundation. The board of directors of the instant school foundation decided to revoke appointment as of December 30, 2016.

B. At around 14:00 on March 21, 2017, the Defendants collected several reporters at G viewing Bring room, and carried out a press conference with the following contents under the name of the University Professors Council (hereinafter “instant press conference”).

(1) The Prosecutor's Office shall conduct an investigation into the Plaintiff's detention, i.e., the Plaintiff's investigation into the Plaintiff, i.e., school affairs corruption, construction misconduct corruption, professors' improper departure, human rights pressure, etc., “The Plaintiff shall donate the educational assets to G and i.e., the Plaintiff shall respectively investigate the current university corruption that is filed with the Prosecutor's Office at the Supreme Prosecutors' Office at the Ministry of Education.” The Prosecutor's Office shall conduct an integrated audit from 11 auditors dispatched to the Auditor's Office at the Ministry of Education from June 13 to 22 of the past year. The results of the audit were 127 warnings, 22 minor disciplinary action, 8 minor caution measures, etc., issued a warning to the instant school juristic person and the instant university without publicly announcing them to the G2B (Comprehensive Electronic Procurement System), and the public prosecutor's office is discovered in the conclusion of a negotiated contract, budget research funds-related audit, and "the amount exceeding the expected amount of KRW 200 million."