A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On July 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around a D cafeteria located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) brought about a dispute with the victim E (27 tax) on the ground that the Defendant satisf around the D cafeteria; and (c) caused the victim E (27) and the shoulder; (d) caused the victim’s injury to the victim’s head’s satisfy that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Some statements made by the prosecution of the defendant and each police investigation protocol (including E statements);

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Police seizure records (excluding E statements);

1. A photograph of damage, the list of reported cases, and a record of the recording thereof;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Recognition and judgment of conviction under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order

1. The victim made consistent statements on the facts of injury identical to the facts of the crime from the initial investigation of the police to the prosecution and this court (when the defendant was the first beer disease, the victim was replaced by another beer disease on the part of another beer disease, and the first beer disease of the defendant, and thereafter the defendant was present during the second beer disease of the second beer disease, and the victim was present during the second beer disease of the victim.).

The evidence and the evidence of the judgment, including this, are recognized as a result, and the victim's objection requires a harsh treatment for two weeks (in the judgment of the court), the victim requested the police to report it at two times or reported it to the police directly, and immediately after the instant case, the defendant first taken out the talk about the agreed gold (as a record recorded by the defendant at the time, it seems that the defendant first saw the talk about the agreed gold, and then the victim was the victim.