The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion on September 30, 2018, the Defendant: (a) arbitrarily dismantled Han-gun, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, the Plaintiff owned, for damage; (b) removed and stolen materials, such as weather and wood; and (c) thereby, the Plaintiff lost an opportunity to sell the instant housing to a third party; and (d) incurred damage to the Plaintiff’s expense for removal of the said housing.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 80,00,000 equivalent to the purchase price and the removal cost of KRW 13,750,00,000, plus damages for delay.

2. In light of the following circumstances, the Plaintiff filed a criminal complaint against the removal business entity, purchaser, and Defendant related to the removal of the instant house and the purchase and sale of materials, and the crime of larceny and destruction and damage of property, etc., which were revealed in full view of the overall purport of the statements and arguments as stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 14, and 16, and the Plaintiff issued a final decision of rejection of appeal against the Defendant, and issued a final decision of rejection of appeal against the Defendant, the evidence alone submitted by the Plaintiff is insufficient to acknowledge that the Defendant arbitrarily dismantled the instant house and removed the materials and stolen them. There is no other evidence to support this.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.