A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 3690"

1. On August 29, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around C’s main points located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul on August 29, 2018, the Defendant: (b) taken the body of the victim D (39 tax) that wn away from a cell phone to a cell phone; (c) reported the police vehicle called for the victim to be crossed out his/her photograph; and (d) assaulted the victim’s head and face at least three times on the floor of his/her hand by reporting the police vehicle called for the victim’s report.

2. On August 31, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 23:45, around the first floor of the building in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) on the ground that the victim F (68 years of age) who is a security guard is the victim F. (68 years of age) was the victim’s face, seven times in drinking; and (c) twice in drinking the victim’s arms that prevent face, the Defendant was sprinked to the victim for approximately two weeks of treatment.

3. On August 31, 2018, around 23:54, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at the place of port No. 2, and at the police station G police station G police station in Gangnam-gu, Seoul (35) where he was called upon upon receiving a report, and assaulted the chest of the above H in his hand by blocking the front of the above He’s defect in order to identify the content of this report.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

"2018 Highest 3891"

1. From August 31, 2018 to 04:40 to August 31, 2018, the Defendant: (a) within a L restaurant operated by the victim K (n, 26 years old) in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul for about 30 minutes; (b) sought the payment of meal from the damaged person; and (c) at the same time, the Defendant: (d) sought the payment of meal from the injured person; and (d) made it available to the customers, “I will see, see,

Recognizing that “the victim will not pay money” to the victim, the customer and his/her employees, who had been in place, feel a threat and prevented them from entering the said place.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force.

2. The Defendant interferes with the performance of official duties.