beta
Text
Defendant
A A Fines 2,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 1,500,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 1,50,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants are those who operated the call text at the first floor of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E Apartment Complex Underground (hereinafter referred to as the “instant shopping mall”) and entered into a lease agreement with some of the owners of the instant shopping mall, and the victim F is those who opposed to the Defendants’ operation of the call text among the owners of the instant shopping mall, H, Ha, Hawon Gong, and ju ju ju Duz, who are delegated with the management authority of the parts owned by the Defendants.
From February 17, 2017, the Defendants gathered to remove the partitions of the part owned and managed by the victim in order to perform the cream construction work in the instant commercial building, and around February 17, 2017, the market price where the victim installed in the instant commercial building due to the joint board, sandboard position plate, etc. in the part of Nos. 2110, B18, B142, B144, B146, B158, B158, etc. was destroyed by a mix, sandbox, and a mix with the parts of the construction work.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to damage the property owned by the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (related to dynamic images submitted by the injured party), investigation report (Submission of genuineF evidentiary materials);
1. Relevant Articles 366 and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: Articles 366 and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines
1. Defendants detained in the Nowon-gu: Taking into account the fact that there are a number of records of criminal punishment for the same crime committed against Defendant A for the reason of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, and that the damage was not recovered. Defendant B and C have no record of criminal punishment for the same crime committed against the Defendants, and the degree of contribution to the instant crime by the Defendants, etc. are considered.