Of the facts charged in the instant case, the fact of occupational embezzlement in the case of 2013 senior group1787 and the case of 2015 senior group200.

The case of "2013 Highest 1159" by the Public Prosecutor's Office

1. Around March 23, 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Republic of Korea to purchase and supply 50,000 won of H from March 23, 2012 to May 1, 2012, and, from March 23, 2012 to April 2, 2012, he/she deposited 135 million won in the K’s account (the mother’s account. M) used by I (hereinafter referred to as the same L), and was in custody for the victim I, from around April 10, 2012 to around April 24, 2016, he/she remitted N (the Defendant’s personal debt worth KRW 13 million around March 23, 2012, KRW 300,000 around April 26, 201, KRW 4060,000 (the Defendant’s 200,000 won around April 24, 2012), as the Defendant’s personal debt.

2. Fraud;

A. The Defendant who defrauded 10 million lease deposit with the victim S, etc. from October 201 to July 31, 201, operated a wholesale and retail company of import category with the trade name of “I” with the victim S, etc.

On January 17, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would use KRW 10 million, half of the deposit, as the principal office operating expenses, to the victim’s office.”

However, in fact, the office deposit was only 8 million won, and the money received from the victim was considered to be used to pay the defendant's personal debt.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received money of KRW 10 million from the victim to the national bank account in the name of K to receive money from the victim.

B. The Defendant, by deceptioning 135 million won of the price of goods, was placed at a situation in which the goods cannot be supplied to the J because all of the price of the clothes received from J as described in Paragraph 1 is consumed for personal use, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant I around May 17, 2012.