logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.12.22 2016고정111
신용협동조합법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who was elected in the election of the president of the Korea Credit Union, which was implemented on February 8, 2014.

No one shall provide, or promise to provide, any money, goods, entertainment or other property benefits to an elector for the purpose of getting him/her elected or not elected as an executive of a credit union.

On February 2, 2014, around 11:00, the Defendant stated that the community hall located in Sejong-si E, stating that “I will leave the hall to the president of the Korea Communications Union, and request it well,” among 11 members, such as F, etc., the Defendant sent to the said F an envelope containing KRW 50,000 won in cash, KRW 4,000 in total, KRW 200,000.

Accordingly, the Defendant provided F with KRW 200,000 to the elector for the purpose of winning the credit union president.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. The recording of statements by witnesses H in the third protocol of trial;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel by one recording file, one recording file, one recording recording recording recording, and one copy

1. The summary of the assertion and the defense counsel shall deny the facts constituting the crime that the defendant does not offer money and goods to F at the time and place of the crime.

2. Determination

A. The major evidence to prove the facts constituting a crime is the “one of the Nice Recording Files,” in which the F’s statement is recorded, and the police protocol with respect to F (the authenticity of the petition is recognized by the witness F’s statement at the sixth trial date). Ultimately, the credibility of F’s statement is the key issue.

B. On February 10, 2014, the F made a statement to the effect that G was given money from the Defendant while hospitalized in J Hospital on February 10, 2014, G was recorded. 2) G was a candidate for the Defendant’s competition and that F was favorable to G by having known the Defendant’s wife for a long period of time.

arrow