The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts1) The Defendant did not take the part of the victim’s entrance and exit, and did not see the part of the victim’s left left part. Although the fact was found in the High Return Order, it was merely a part of the victim’s inner part, and there was no intention to inflict an injury on the victim, even if the Defendant’s act committed an injury identical to the facts charged, it was only the result of passive resistance against the victim’s unilateral assault. Thus, the Defendant’s above act constitutes an act that does not violate social rules and thus cannot be punished.

B. The sentence (one million won of fine) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. 직권판단 항소이유에 관한 판단에 앞서 직권으로 살피건대, 검사가 당심에서 이 사건 공소사실을 "피고인은 2012. 1. 5. 12:50경 인천시 부평구 C상가 내 D사진점 앞에서, 전철역 방향으로 가던 중 할 말이 있다며 피해자 E에게 나오라고 하자 피해자가 할 말이 없다며 그냥 가라고 했는데도 피해자의 가게 앞으로 지나가겠다고 하면서 ‘젊은 새끼가 그렇게 살지 마’라고 욕을 하였고, 이에 피해자가 피고인을 넘어뜨리는 등 폭행하자, 이에 대항하여 피해자의 멱살을 잡아 흔들고 피고인이 바닥에 넘어져 있는 상태에서 손으로 피해자의 고환 부분 및 겨드랑이 부분을 잡아당기고 피해자의 입술 부분을 발로 찼다.

The victim continued to return to the Dichot point, and the defendant, according to the victim, carried the victim's flabage within the flaps photographer store, and laid down the part of the victim's flab on the floor by hanging it on the floor by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant needs to provide the victim E with a 21-day medical treatment.