logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2017.05.26 2016가합1922
보증채무금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 470,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from November 18, 2016 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 1, 2016, the Defendant is a corporation engaging in deferred payment sales, bill discount, etc., and completed registration by changing its trade name from the “Sdidi Capital” to the “Sdi Capital of a stock company”.

B. Around October 2014, MP Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “MP”) entered into a contract with GV General Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “YD General Construction”). Around October 2014, MP Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “MP”) entered into a contract with GV General Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “YD General Construction”) to take charge of executing and selling construction, such as interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior of D, Dobong-gu, Seoul, which was constructed as the GV General Construction, and the Plaintiff offered a proposal to participate in the sales agency work under the above contract with E (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiff”).

C. On the other hand, the progress of the construction project on the B-P lending from the existing buyers of the B-P lending at the latest, with frequent resistances, and the Plaintiff, who performed the sales agency business, urged the construction project on the B-P lending.

Since the construction work was delayed due to the failure to receive the construction cost from the construction of the preliminary complex, among the above sub-sectioned sections of the loan, the Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff to the effect that the building B was sold in lots on the part of the Plaintiff and paid cash received from the buyer from the buyer to the IM to perform the construction work performed by using it.

Accordingly, the plaintiff's side sold part of the substitute goods to other buyers, and the six households of a sectioned building, such as E and C 84th 105th 503th 503th 102 202nd 102nd 6th 102nd 202nd 202, among the substitute goods, the plaintiff becomes each buyer and has been sold from the comprehensive tugboat construction, and the down payment, etc. by each of the above sales contracts are in accordance with the agreement in the sales contract.

arrow