(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.07.14 2015나4942 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.07.14 2015나4942

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The part of the instant lawsuit, which was added in the trial, shall be dismissed.

2.(a)

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked.

(b).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The registration of ownership transfer of each of the instant real estate 1) 1 real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant 1 real estate”) as indicated in the separate sheet, and the method of marking the remaining real estate is also same.

(2) On April 19, 1968, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of “D” and “D” and “F” of Chang-gun, public official, and official and official and official and official (hereinafter “B”) with respect to the instant real estate under the name of the Chang-won District Court on September 19, 1973, the registration office was dismissed on September 19, 1973, and was sold on February 5, 1968.

3) On March 6, 1935, the registration of ownership transfer was completed under the name of Changwon District Court: (a) No. 2347, which was received on March 6, 1935; (b) No. 2347; (c) No. 4); and (d) No. 3074, the registration office was received on May 31, 196, and the registration office was received on May 31, 196; and (d) No. 3074, the registration of ownership transfer was completed under the name of “D” and “UF” of Chang Chang-gun.

(hereinafter referred to as the “each of the above registrations of ownership transfer” is each of the registrations in this case.

D and Defendant’s registration number 1) The Defendant’s registration number is “E” on the registration number certificate for the registration of the real estate registration number, which is a clan located in “Y” and “E”. 2) The name is “D” and the registration number is indicated in the Defendant’s registration number.

【Ground of recognition】 There is no dispute, Gap 1’s description, the inquiry result about the head of the first instance court, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Determination ex officio as to the legitimacy of the part concerning the claim for confirmation among the lawsuit of this case

A. In the sense that the clan members of the clan C, which is the plaintiffs' arguments, are those who know about the Do, the defendant was called D from the old day.

Therefore, the Defendant completed the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of “D” with respect to each of the instant real estate owned by the Defendant.

Defendant and D are the same person.

유사 판례

-창원지방법원밀양지원 2015.05.13 2014가단2251

-창원지방법원 밀양지원 2018.04.25 2017가단11768

-창원지방법원 2019.01.17 2018나55903

-부산지방법원서부지원 2020.02.14 2019가단101531