The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is that the Defendant only prevented the other party from approaching and approaching the other party as a means of defending the other party from unilateral assault, and did not commit any intentional assault.

2. Each statement of E, G, H, and I, the other party to the board, is relatively consistent and consistent from the investigative agency to the original court’s trial, and there is no inconsistency in each other’s statement, and even if the opposite party who made mutual assault with the Defendant, the part of the statement made by the Defendant cannot be deemed to be credibility, and in full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, including the damaged side photo, investigation report (on-site motion picture image) as well as the evidence duly adopted and examined, it may be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant committed the victims as described in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the lower court, among those on which the other party and the body fighting were punished.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.