Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On April 29, 2014, at around 19:45, the Defendant was stopping at the two-lanes in order to turn to the left the right by driving the above taxi, and driving the five-lane road in front of the filial length distance in the north-dong, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do.

Since the location is where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with good faith.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and received the front part of the Dalob that the victim C(the age of 39) drives in accordance with the new subparagraph from the negligent part of the right-hand turn to the right-hand turn of the above taxi, which was driven by the victim C(the age of 39).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as brain damage requiring medical treatment for about 16 weeks due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Evidence List No. 12);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for orders to attend lectures and orders to provide community service;

1. Where the basic area (including specially mitigated persons), penalty not (including serious efforts to recover damage), or serious injury has occurred (the first type) of general traffic accidents (the scope of recommendation).

2. The Defendant, by negligence in the course of driving a motor vehicle in violation of the vehicle traffic signal, suffered injury to the victim requiring medical treatment for about 16 weeks. The Defendant is aware of the degree of negligence of the Defendant and whether the victim was in an unidentified state after the instant case.