1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with A with respect to B EFrocketing vehicles (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs”). The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to CST vehicles (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicles”).

At around 18:10 on March 2, 2015, D, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, had the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, which is to turn to the left-hand left-hand turn on the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, going to the front part of the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, while driving under the straight line from the front side of the Nengdong-dong Daejeon-dong 135-1 Hyundai Apartment-dong, Daejeon (hereinafter “instant intersection”) to the front part of the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, which is to turn to the right-hand left-hand turn on the front side of the efficien

(hereinafter “instant accident.” As a result of deliberation by the Defendant’s deliberation committee on the dispute over the payment of insurance proceeds and the reimbursement of insurance proceeds for the damage of Defendant vehicle caused by the instant accident, the Defendant paid KRW 6,456,00 as insurance proceeds for the damage of Defendant vehicle, and filed a request for deliberation with the Dispute Deliberation Committee on the Compensation for Automobile Insurance (hereinafter “Dispute Deliberation Committee”).

On August 17, 2015, the Dispute Deliberation Committee decided to deliberate and coordinate the ratio of the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s liability to 10%, and on September 8, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 645,600 to the Defendant 10% of the insurance money paid by the Defendant as the indemnity amount.

(hereinafter referred to as “the claim amount of this case”). 【No dispute exists, evidence Nos. 1 through 8, evidence Nos. 1 through 3, evidence Nos. 1 through 5, each entry and video Nos. 5 (including the serial number, hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the entire pleadings, the plaintiff’s argument as to the ground for the claim is that the accident of this case occurred due to the total negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle.

Therefore, as the plaintiff, the repair cost of the defendant vehicle.