logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.12.03 2015가합32592
근로에관한 소송
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant entered into each of the instant consignment contracts between the Defendant and Catice Co., Ltd., Korea Ltd., Ltd., Ltd. and the Defendant entrusted the instant consignment contracts from July 10, 2002 to early 2000 to the Defendant’s department store delivery services. From then on May 31, 2014, the Defendant changed the contract from Catice Co., Ltd to Korea’s home delivery, and entrusted the other party to the instant consignment. From June 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015, the Defendant entered into all of the consignment contracts with Defendant Patice Co., Ltd., Ltd., to change the other party to the instant contract and entrust it (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant consignment contracts”) with the other party to the instant contract, as follows.

The defendant of the local delivery service contract and the soft service corporation shall enter into a local delivery service contract as follows:

Article 1(Purpose) The purpose of this Agreement is to deliver to the defendant's respective department stores of the defendant to places designated by the defendant, using clives corporation (based on one ton) air conditioning, goods delivered from the defendant's respective department stores to the defendant's customers, and the defendant shall provide for matters necessary for the payment of the price pursuant to Article 2 to the clives corporation.

Article 2 (Terms of Contracts) (1) The number of places in the department stores, air conditioners, vehicles (hereinafter referred to as "delivery vehicles") and the unit price of contracts shall refer to the details of separate contracts.

(2) The contract amount shall be KRW 3,000,000 (excluding KRW 3,016,000,000, and value-added tax).

(3) The contractual unit price referred to in paragraph (1) shall be six days per week, and where the defendant works on a holiday due to the defendant's circumstances, the defendant shall be paid a holiday allowance for each vehicle.

arrow