1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 3, 2010, the Postal Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Postal Construction”) contracted from nine building owners, including the Plaintiffs 4 (hereinafter “building owners of the Plaintiff, etc.”) a new construction project for 20 households on the land of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant construction project”).

When entering into the instant construction contract, the owner of the building, including the plaintiffs, etc., owns 9 households among the newly constructed buildings as the owner of the building, etc., and the remaining 11 households were sold in general to the general public to appropriate the sale price for the repayment of the obligation for the construction price of this case.

B. After that, G, from the construction of the instant construction, contracted for the completion of the construction, such as the installation, drawing, floor, landscaping, etc. of the instant construction, and the Defendant, upon introduction from G, received the introduction of G, supplied the completion of the construction and the construction of the Dog and its floor during the said completion.

C. On March 4, 2014, G entered into a contract with the Postal Construction Division with the content that “470 million won out of the instant construction price claims that Postal Construction has against the owner of the instant construction project, including the Plaintiffs, shall be transferred to G, and the right to representation in the notice of transfer shall be granted to G” (hereinafter “transfer of claims”).

Accordingly, around April 14, 2014, G notified the owner of the instant assignment of claims, including the Plaintiffs, etc., and around that time, G reached the owner of the instant assignment of claims.

On February 12, 2015, the Defendant filed an application for a payment order with the owner of the building, including the Plaintiffs, etc., to the effect that “the Defendant subcontracted the construction of the instant construction to the Do and the floor during the instant construction from the Dor Construction, and the owner of the building, including the Plaintiffs, etc., does not pay KRW 60 million of the Dor and the floor construction cost out of the instant bonds, and the owner of the building, etc., such as the Plaintiffs, etc., is obliged to pay the Defendant the above KRW 60 million and delay damages therefrom.”