1. The plaintiff A:

A. Defendant C: (a) with respect to KRW 1,311,00,000 and KRW 700,000 among them, from April 26, 2010; and (b) with respect to KRW 286,00.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties (1) The Defendant Company is a company established for the purpose of investment advisory business, discretionary investment business, investment trading business, investment intermediary business, collective investment business, etc., and the Defendant C has worked as the D Team E that manages bond assets in the Defendant Company from October 2002 to January 2012.

(2) The Plaintiffs are investors who suffered losses after making an investment according to Defendant C’s recommendation for investment.

On the other hand, the plaintiff A is the only director of the plaintiff company and is the representative of the plaintiff company.

B. In the event that from around 203, the Defendant C lent money to himself from around 2003 to invest in stocks and futures options with respect to 12M private equity funds 24, the Defendant C had been aware of a lot of losses, which did not exist in order to meet this, she had the intent to acquire money from investors by means of false representation as it was made in the name of the Defendant Company, and as if it was an investment product managed by the Defendant Company.

(2) Around November 2009, Defendant C, through the introduction of F, who is a type of private investment, recommended that the Plaintiff A make an offer at a discounted price in the form of participation by the Defendant Company (hereinafter “instant public offering offer”) in the name of “No. 12M private equity fund 24” (hereinafter “instant fund”) under the name of “No. 12M private equity fund 24”) with a maturity of 8% per annum since the Plaintiff B met and around that time, and the Plaintiff A made a solicitation to make an investment in the instant fund with a maturity of 1 year, unlike a general public offering with a high competition rate, the Defendant Company received an offer at a discounted price in the form of participation by the Defendant Company, and that most of the Defendant Company’s employees or specific customers make an investment in the public offering offer offer (hereinafter “instant public offering offer offer offer”).

However, at the time of fact, the fund of this case or the subscription goods of this case did not exist.

(3) Defendant C appealed that his marketing performance on March 30, 2010 was poor and that he would be at a disadvantage in personnel affairs.