logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.02.09 2016고단1538
변호사법위반등
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;

Defendant

A 12,100,000 won shall be additionally collected.

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The "2016 Highest 1530" T (the suspension of indictment on the same day) is a game water-related business entity running the "V Gameland" in U.S. The defendant B is the president of the above game site, the defendant C and the defendant E are employees of the above game site, and the defendant D and the defendant A are the figures of T and the defendant B.

1. Defendant B

A. The Defendant, from January 19, 2016 to November 15:40 of the same month, prepared a monthly tax agreement on the building "V Gameland" in his/her name in order to assist customers to exchange the tangible and intangible results acquired through the use of the game product after installing the N-N-123-05 (class classification number:CC-15123-05) game machine 40 (class classification number): and assist customers to exchange them with the above five game products in his/her name; and from around October 20, 2015, he/she prepared a monthly tax agreement on the building "V Gameland" in order to assist customers to exchange them with the above V game products; and from around November 16, 2015, he/she prepared for a "V gameland" juvenile game providing business operator; and prepared for an "employee food providing service" in order to provide them with meals if they wish to do so.

B. On October 2015, the Defendant also entered into a contract for permission and rent for a game room in the name of the Defendant to reduce the amount of KRW 100,000 per day from T at a “X” restaurant located in W at the time of 2015, and if the Defendant is under control after entering into a contract for the permission and rent of the game room under the name of the Defendant, the Defendant would be punished by stating that the Defendant was unemployed. Until now, if there is a problem, such as granting the monthly rent of the smuggling office and granting a fine instead if a fine is imposed, it will be dealt

No matter how to see and control, it would be said that it is an employer.

Upon receipt of the proposal to the effect that “,” and accepting the proposal, they promised to undergo an investigation as if they were the actual business owners of the game hall on behalf of the said T and receive punishment.

The Defendant had operated the game room in the above V Gameland.

arrow