The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentence (one year and four months of imprisonment, confiscation) is deemed to be too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant committed the crime of this case repeatedly against many unspecified victims on six occasions, including the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case, which was sentenced to a punishment for the same type of larceny, and the fact that the damage has not been restored. However, since 197, there was no record of punishment for the same crime, since there was an old age, family and occupation, it seems that the crime of this case was caused to the crime of this case in the situation where it is difficult for the defendant to maintain his livelihood due to the lack of his/her family and occupation, the fact that he/she seems to receive basic living, and that he/she again does not repeat again, taking full account of the circumstances of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the situation after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc., it is not recognized that the court below's punishment is too uneasible and unfair. Thus, the prosecutor's aforementioned assertion

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.