logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.08.28 2017가단133021
위자료
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 12,00,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from October 25, 2017 to August 28, 2018.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in evidence Nos. 1 through 10, the Plaintiff and C were legally married couple who completed the marriage report on June 25, 1992, and have two children (the 1993 married, the 200 children) between them. The Defendant knew that C had sexual intercourse with C’s spouse while trying to prepare for commencement of the business from the marriage ceremony around November 2015 at the first time, and around A, around A, 2016, he had sexual intercourse with C (the fact that C had sexual intercourse before December 2, 2016, the opening of the business at C). On the first half of the year 2017, the Plaintiff and C had become aware of two children (the 1993 married, the 200s children). After the marriage ceremony, the Plaintiff had become aware of three or more weeks at the hotel and other threats.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant, even though he is a spouse of C, has committed an unlawful act, such as maintaining a marital relationship, continuously having a sexual intercourse, and committing a threatening act before his child, etc., causing a failure to the extent that it is impossible to observe the common life of the plaintiff and C. As such, it is obvious in light of the rule of experience that the plaintiff suffered a considerable mental pain, the defendant is obligated to go against the plaintiff in cash.

2. The scope of liability for damages shall include all the circumstances shown in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the content and degree, period, marriage and family relationship of the Plaintiff and C, the influence of the Defendant’s fraudulent act on the Plaintiff’s marital life, and the circumstances after the fraudulent act, and set the amount of consolation money.

However, in the case of this case, the plaintiff and C have serious close close close to the problem that the plaintiff's mother's mother's mother's mother's mother's mother's body was found during the year of the late 2016, and immediately after the plaintiff's death, the plaintiff will pay for management from October's salary to C and support the plaintiff.

arrow