1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 59,347,90 for Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 18,885,700 for Plaintiff B; and (c) KRW 6,784,90 for Plaintiff C and each of the said money.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: Housing site development (Cheongju District) - Public notice - May 2, 2008 - Project operator E published on May 2, 2008 - Defendant

(b) The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on June 20, 2013 - The land to be expropriated is as indicated in the column of the land to be expropriated.

- Compensation: As shown in the separate sheet "compensation for adjudication on expropriation";

- From the starting date of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on August 13, 2013 - An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation and the Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter referred to as “appraisals on expropriation”) (hereinafter referred to as “appraisals on expropriation”) and the results of the appraisal are “appraisals on expropriation.”

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on November 21, 2013 - Compensation for losses: As indicated in the separate sheet “compensation for objection”.

- An appraisal corporation: the Korea Appraisal Corporation and the Korea Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “appraisal for an objection”) and the Korea Appraisal Corporation, and the result of the appraisal is referred to as the “appraisal for an objection”).

D. The result of the commission of market price appraisal by the appraiser F of this Court – Compensation for losses: Each of the “court appraisal amount” listed in the separate sheet is recorded.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including the provisional number), the result of a request for appraisal of the market price with respect to appraiser F by this court (hereinafter " appraiser F", "court appraisal", the result of the appraisal is referred to as "court appraisal"), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. In the plaintiffs' assertion, since the plaintiffs' judgment of this case unfairly underassessment of losses for the land to be expropriated in this case, the defendant should pay the difference between the compensation for the above land and the compensation for losses and the compensation for losses under the expropriation or this ruling of this case, which were reasonably calculated by the court's appraisal.

(b)in litigation with respect to an increase or decrease of compensation for expropriation, each appraisal that forms the basis for adjudication and each court.