logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2013.11.14 2012고정1864
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(공중밀집장소에서의추행)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On April 29, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 05:45, the Defendant: (b) Danyang-si, Goyang-si, U.S., U.S., the six floors of the facts charged, concentrated on Eins or yellow banks on the sixth floor of the D Building in the Goyang-gu, U.S., U.S.; (c) Dan F (25 years old); (d) Dan-gu, had the victim F (hereinafter referred to as “the 25 years old”), had the victim knife by inciting the victim’s knife and panty; and (d) had the victim’s knife knife

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim in a densely concentrated place by the public.

2. As evidence corresponding to the above facts charged, F’s investigative agencies and this Court has made statements.

However, according to the records, F was a shoulder of the above facts charged, and F was a locked dice in the wall side of the entrance immediately inside the entrance of a yellow bank where the door is unfolded, and F was a 24-hour shop outside the yellow bank, and there was a store operated for 24 hours outside the yellow bank, and there was a person who was locked in the resting room in the resting room as a situation where he did not do so (in light of the nature of the soup room, it appears that he did not do so even before and after the soup and after the soup, he did not seem to have been able to do so). In full view of the following facts, the evidence presented by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the defendant was misunderstanding or indecent act by being committed against the other defendant.

3. According to the conclusion, the facts charged against the defendant constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure

arrow