logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.12.11 2013고단1535
상해
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

At around 20:00 on March 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dhop Cluster; (b) in the dispute with the victim E (57 years of age) who was aware of the victim’s flab; (c) was flabing the victim’s flab; and (d) was flabing the victim’s face and chest by going on the part of the victim; (d) was flabing the victim’s flab; and (e) was flabing the victim’s face and chest by drinking; and (e) was flabing the victim’s face and chest by going on the part of the victim’s ship; (e) was flabing the victim’s finger; and (e) was flabing the victim’s finger; and (e) was flabing the victim’s finger; and (e) was flabing the victim

The grounds of innocence

1. The statements in E/F investigative agencies and in this Court, consistent with the facts charged, are not trusted for the following reasons, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge them.

E’s statement on the background beyond the above head of E’s office was made by the police that he would go to the passage of the police, and was in excess of his own will, but this court stated that the above statement was false, and there is no credibility of E’s statement.

B. As to the process during which fighting began in the above headline, E stated that the Defendant first started to stroke the eth, and F made a statement that the police began to stroke the eth, the Defendant, and the Defendant. However, in this court, the Defendant stated that the Defendant started to stroke the eth which the Defendant seated, and that the Defendant started to stroke the eth, but the Defendant did not have any reason to exercise violence first against E, and rather, the Defendant met the Defendant for several days to follow the Defendant’s wife, and the Defendant had a reason to exercise violence first against E, in light of the fact that E had a reason to exercise violence first, the above statements that the Defendant used violence against E are not believed.

(c) E did not drink after the completion of fighting in this Court, and does not drink in the telecom, and does so at the telecom, and the symptoms and trees of the fingers to the hospital.

arrow