logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2020.04.23 2020고단245
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 29, 2008, the Defendant received a fine of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Eastern District Court on the same day, and a summary order of KRW 2 million as a fine for the same crime at the same court on March 18, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle with B A-Wurd-

On January 9, 2020, at around 01:59, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.133% of blood alcohol level. On January 9, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car along a two-lane road of 50-lane due to a change in the grance of the U. S. S. in the south-west city of Gyeonggi, along a two-lane road from C to the U.S. basin

No person shall drive a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and on the other hand, he/she has a duty of care to prevent a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle from driving a motor vehicle at a speed or in a manner that causes any danger and injury to others by accurately operating the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting it, and the lower part of the E-learning Motor Vehicle, which is driven in the front bank, was received as the front part of the vehicle operated by the Defendant.

After all, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F (V, 52 years old) who was on board the damaged vehicle due to the above occupational negligence, such as salt, tension, etc. in the clibage requiring treatment for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.13% at the above temporary border, and was driving the said vehicle from the Do located at the south of the Gyeonggi-si to the point of the said accident.

Accordingly, the defendant has driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of Article 44 (1) or (2) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Traffic accident report, ..

arrow