1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff to pay KRW 10,66,701 to the Plaintiff, as well as to pay the amount from April 19, 2015 to November 14, 2018.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) The Plaintiff is a D-Motor vehicle driven by C around 10:50 on April 19, 2015 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

A) On board and alighting from the Bridge parking lot located in E in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, the accident occurred (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Plaintiff sustained injury, such as the pressure pressure pressure pressure of 12 chests, and the escape of conical signboards during the 4-5 Incident.

3) Defendant B church (hereinafter referred to as “B church”)

(1) The Defendant Company is the owner of the Defendant vehicle, and the Defendant Company is the non-life insurance company (hereinafter referred to as “case non-life insurance”).

) The insurer is an insurer which has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle (based on recognition). [In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 7, and Eul evidence No. 1 (including paper numbers, the purport of the whole pleadings)

B. 1) The Defendants asserted that the Plaintiff did not take part in the last lids in the instant accident, not the Plaintiff’s first lids at the time of the instant accident, but the general floor was cut down. However, in full view of the form of the Defendant church parking lot, F’s written statement and the overall purport of oral arguments, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff’s failure to take part in the last lids from the Defendant vehicle was credibility, and it is difficult to believe that Eul’s evidence No. 3 was contrary thereto. 2) The Defendants asserted that the instant accident did not constitute an accident due to the operation of the automobile, or the Defendants’ assertion that the instant accident did not constitute an accident due to the operation of the automobile.

Article 2 subparagraph 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act defines "the use of a motor vehicle according to the usage of the relevant device, regardless of whether a person or article is transported," and the use of a motor vehicle according to the usage of the relevant device means the use of various devices installed according to the purpose of the motor vehicle according to the usage of the relevant device.