Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in CMW 428i.

On May 13, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car on May 15:10, 2016, and led the Defendant to proceed along the intersection of the distance in front of the logistics warehouse D at Gwangju-si along the two-lanes from the end of the terminal, one way from among the three-lanes.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to safely proceed in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and checking the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the Defendant’s vehicle front front part of the Defendant’s car, which was driven by the Victim E (40 years old) who was proceeding in accordance with normal signals from the right side of the proceeding due to the negligence in contravention of the signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a cage cage cage cage sage 9 on the left-hand side, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing black boxes and video CDs;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the degree of injury of the victim on the grounds of sentencing of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not weak; on the other hand, the defendant reflects the fact that the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance policy; the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, family relationship, environment, circumstances and result of the crime; and other circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.

The acquittal portion

1. On May 13, 2016, the Defendant charged with this part of the facts charged at the 112-20 square, a square around 15:10, in front of the D logistics warehouse, from the 112-20 sexual apartment parking lot at the same time.