The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The facts charged in the instant case are as follows: “The Defendant, while operating a restaurant in Ischeon-si B, was a person who wats in the immediately adjacent building of the said restaurant, and was provided meals to many customers, such as victims C (n, 35 years of age) at the above restaurant around July 25, 2018.

At the time, it is night and where many and unspecified customers are frequent. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to take appropriate measures, such as setting up a warning sign sign at a place where people can see the foregoing so that customers are fully aware of the existence of the fat, and to prevent the above fat from drinking out.

Nevertheless, Defendant 1 did not cover the “agreg sign” sign installed on the pents of the above building on the ground of the stress of the above Matat, and did not take measures such as leaving the above Mat in a fat, etc., and the damaged person who misleads the above fat building into a toilet and enters the above fat as a toilet caused by the above fat.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury such as the left-hand knee and the right-hand fingers with which the victim cannot know the number of medical treatment days due to the above negligence.

“.” This constitutes Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act. The Defendant does not want the punishment of the injured party upon agreement with the injured party. Thus, the instant prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act and Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.