The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (limited to eight months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) shall be too unlimited and unfair; and

2. Although the Defendant appears to be against the Defendant’s recognition of the instant crime, the Defendant’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of the instant case, such as the size of the instant sexual traffic business establishment, the period during which the Defendant operated the instant sexual traffic business establishment, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., in light of the following: (a) the Defendant had a total of 17 criminal records, including the previous and the first time; and (b) the mere operation of the sexual traffic business establishment, not only is the mere operation of the sexual traffic business establishment, but also the control over the investigation agency.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.