1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Punishment of the crime

From April 2012 to April 2015, the Defendant left the victim C (n, 29 years of age) and as a researcher, and had the victim hear the horses from the victim.

On July 9, 2015, at around 04:00, the Defendant met the victim in front of the reciting stadium (Saak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stakak Stakakak Stakak Stakakakakakak Stakakakak Stakakak Stakakakak Stakakakak, the Defendant driven the victim with the victim on the top of the D Stak-Jak

The Defendant was demanded by the victim to be the victim to be satisfy and continue to satisfy, but the victim rejected it, satching the victim behind him, satching the victim to the satisfy, satching the victim’s inner part, satching the victim’s inner part, cutting off the victim’s inner part, panty, and inserting his sexual organ into the part of the victim’s sound, but the victim was not able to satisfy and satisfy the victim’s satisfy and satching the defendant

Accordingly, the defendant attempted to rape the victim by assault.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. The police statement concerning C;

3. Application of each statute of photograph;

1. Articles 300 and 297 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

2. Statutory mitigation under Articles 25 (2) and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

3. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

4. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

5. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes;

6. Article 47(1) and Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from disclosure and notification order of registered information, the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse are deemed to have committed the instant crime in a dynamic and friendly manner as the Defendant refuses to accept when he/she continued to have been in a relationship with the victim, and the victim is not subject to punishment against the Defendant, and is punished for sexual crimes.