The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence of one year and six months sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is not unfair in light of the following: although the defendant recognized the crime of this case as well as the degree of damage is minor, it is recognized that the defendant has been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and the defendant committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period for the same kind of crime. Nevertheless, the court below sentenced the defendant to imprisonment for a limited term of one year and six months with a minimum punishment by lowering the minimum sentence of the defendant through discretionary mitigation, and considering the defendant's age, environment, occupation, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, environment, occupation, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.