logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.10.07 2014고정122
청소년보호법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged was the employee of the Korea-U.S.A. D.C.

No one shall sell alcoholic beverages, which are drugs harmful to juveniles, to juveniles.

Nevertheless, at around 23:00 on September 15, 2013, the Defendant sold to four juveniles, including E (18 years of age, women), who were found to work as customers at the singing club that he worked as his employees, with a view to identifying their status, 7 illness and 1 week, etc. from 72,000 won.

2. In the facts charged, four juveniles who are subject to the Defendant’s selling liquor, etc. are E, F, and two male and female.

First of all, for two male persons, one male person was examined as evidence corresponding to the facts charged in this part, and the other person was only the investigation agency of F and this court that he was the birth in 195, and there is only the statement in this court that he was the birth in 1995, and since the above two male persons' names were not clearly specified at all, it is insufficient to view that the above two male persons' statements alone were proven without any reasonable doubt that they are juveniles, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge them.

Next, in light of the following: (a) the Defendant consistently stated in an investigative agency and this court that he was not a juvenile by examining the identification card with respect to E and F; (b) the Defendant also presented the identification card to E in an investigative agency and this court; (c) the Defendant presented the identification card to E at the time of the investigation agency and this court; and (d) made a statement that the photograph of the above identification card was the same as that of E; and (c) the Defendant made a statement that partially corresponds to the Defendant’s assertion; and (d) the Defendant did not confirm the identification card with respect to E and F when confirming the further age with respect to E, as alleged by the Defendant at the time of the instant case.

arrow