A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

A candidate for medical treatment and custody shall be punished by medical treatment and custody.

Criminal facts

【Criminal Treatment and Custody Facts】 Defendant and Applicant for Medical Treatment and Custody (hereinafter “Defendant”) were sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on May 10, 2012 and completed the execution of the sentence on June 6, 2012.

The defendant has committed the following crimes under the state that the defendant lacks the ability or intent to discern things due to mental or physical disorder caused by stimulative disorder, tidal disorder, etc.:

1. Interference with business;

A. At around 15:00 on April 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 3 victims E, etc., who were entering the D office located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building and were working for the business, interfered with the business operation of the victim’s office by force, by doing approximately one hour, such as “total fraud is changed, lusent to Cheongdae and the President, and Dominated, Dominated, and Dominated,” etc.

B. At around 04:00 on April 19, 2014, the Defendant continued to engage in scam and scam in the victim’s hall operated by the victim G in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, while taking a bath to the victim, and despite the victim’s demand for evacuation, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s operation of the party hall by force by visiting the inside of the above party hall for about 30 minutes to other customers who had been placed in the party hall at the above party hall, such as speaking not to know about the victim’s demand for evacuation.

C. On April 20, 2014, at around 12:00, the Defendant: (a) called the victim K of the said restaurant without sea at the J restaurant located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu I, that “it is possible to live all of the students in the sinking area of the Sewol ferry”; (b) let the tree gate in his possession get off the table and let all of the other customers in his possession go out of the restaurant, thereby obstructing the victim’s operation of the restaurant by force.

At around 13:10 on April 2, 2014, the Defendant entered the D office as described in the foregoing paragraph (a) and was in duty to compensate for damage to the victim E, and he/she was off from all clothes he/she kept.