logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.08.11 2017고단2160
유사수신행위의규제에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, each of the defendants B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On May 13, 2015, the Changwon District Court was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended execution on May 21, 2015 for violating the Act on the Regulation of Similar Receiving Acts in the Changwon District Court Branch.

Defendant

A is a person who actually operates the KAH, and Defendant C, as the I of the above H, recruited investors, Defendant C, D, and B, and Defendant A recruited to engage in similar receipt by holding an investment presentation.

No one shall engage in any similar receipt business engaged in a business of raising funds under the pretext of investments, etc. under an agreement to pay the total amount of investments or an amount in excess thereof to many and unspecified persons in the future without obtaining authorization or permission, making registration, or making a report, etc. under the related Acts

Nevertheless, the Defendants, without obtaining authorization, permission, etc. from the competent authority on October 23, 2014, at the 3rd floor building near the J market in North-gu, Northern-gu, Northern-si, North-si, Y, “H is a real estate investment company, and is a company that purchases the self-confiscing land and sells it in a non-confiscing manner, and makes an investment of KRW 10 million,00,000,000,000,000 won, including the principal and interest, every day for three months from three days after three days.

If an investment of at least 5 million won is made, the amount of dividends shall be paid 24 times in total by 88,650,000 won in total from September 29, 2014 to November 18, 2014, including the receipt of KRW 288,650,000 in total from September 201 to November 18, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. At the first trial date of Defendant A and B, the third time of Defendant C and D.

arrow