logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.03.23 2015고정1359
명예훼손
Text

The defendant shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment against the defendant not guilty.

Reasons

1. The summary of the charge is that the Defendant is a person living in 905 of the building in Kimhae-si, and the victim D is a manager of the building in C.

Although there was no fact that the injured party has embezzled public funds while carrying out the construction of the outer wall of the building, the Defendant did not grasp the intent of allowing the injured party to leave the management office at the Esing room in the case of C Building 401 on February 8, 2015, and without properly grasping the facts of the intent of allowing the injured party to leave the management office at the Esing room in the case of C Building 401 on February 8, 2015.

The end of the meeting was the end of the meeting."

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. The evidence that corresponds to the facts charged in the instant case was stated by the witness F, “A witness who renders it difficult for the warden to take the charge of harming the enemy.”

Recognizing that “.......”

“ Inasmuch as there was a statement made in this Court to the effect that “ ” was a statement, an investigation report (Attachment of a written statement), and a written statement made by the police against the victim to the effect that F took the said intent, the direct evidence that corresponds to the facts charged in the instant case is only F’s statement.

Therefore, in full view of the following circumstances, as to the credibility of F’s statement, it is difficult to believe that the witness F’s above statement and the investigation report (a statement attached) stated to the same purport is recorded, and it is difficult to believe that the victim’s police statement was made merely the F’s transfer of such a statement, and otherwise, the Defendant made F the same remarks as the facts charged.

there is no evidence to determine the person.

A. On March 11, 2015, F told “F” to the effect that “the Defendant was able to drink this Domoous by a managing director (victim).”

“A statement” written to the effect that it is “ shall be deemed to be a statement attached to an investigation report (Attachment to a Statement) and the “instant statement.”

arrow